Business
Which UAE transactions require transfer-pricing analysis and documentation?
Map UAE related-party and connected-person transactions, arm’s-length methods, disclosure, master/local-file thresholds and supporting evidence.
Contact us

Overview
UAE Corporate Tax requires transactions and arrangements between Related Parties to meet the arm’s-length standard. That substantive rule applies independently from the separate thresholds for maintaining a master file and local file. A smaller business may fall below those file thresholds and still need defensible pricing, contracts, calculations and evidence for related-party or Connected Person amounts.
Article 34 of the current Corporate Tax Law defines an arm’s-length result by comparison with what independent persons would have achieved in similar circumstances. The FTA Transfer Pricing Guide explains the analysis and evidence expected in practice.
Start with the relationship and transaction inventory
Do not begin with a benchmark database. First identify every person and arrangement that may enter the rules:
- shareholders and entities they control;
- parent, subsidiary and sister companies;
- common-control and joint-control relationships;
- directors, officers, owners and other Connected Persons;
- family relationships relevant under the statutory definitions;
- permanent establishments, branches and head office;
- partnerships, trusts, foundations or other arrangements in the group;
- transactions with exempt, free-zone or non-resident persons.
Then reconcile that map to the general ledger, contracts, bank payments, invoices, payroll, board minutes and tax return. A group chart alone will not reveal undocumented services, guarantees or free use of intellectual property.
The arm’s-length rule and documentation thresholds are different layers
| Layer | Core question | Practical output |
|---|---|---|
| Arm’s-length standard | Would independent persons agree a comparable result in comparable circumstances? | Pricing analysis and evidence for the transaction |
| Connected Person deductibility | Is the payment for services or benefit and no more than market value? | Role, work, benefit, approval and value evidence |
| Return disclosure | What related-party/connected-person information does the current return require? | Reconciled disclosure schedule |
| Master/local files | Does Ministerial Decision No. 97 require formal files? | Contemporaneous OECD-format files |
| FTA request | What supporting information must be supplied and by when? | Indexed response pack and audit trail |
Falling below a formal file threshold answers only one row. It does not turn related-party pricing into an unregulated choice.
Current master-file and local-file conditions
Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 requires both files where either:
- the taxable person is at any time in the period a constituent company of an MNE Group with total consolidated group revenue of at least AED 3.15 billion; or
- the taxable person’s revenue in the relevant period is at least AED 200 million.
These are file-maintenance conditions, not exemptions from the arm’s-length standard. Confirm group revenue, local revenue and entity status for each tax period, and preserve the calculation.
The decision also specifies which transactions are included or excluded from the local file. That classification must be read with the exact counterparty status; a broad label such as “domestic company” is insufficient.
Describe what each party actually does
Transfer pricing follows functions, assets and risks rather than invoice wording alone. For each material transaction record:
- who decides and who performs the work;
- people, systems, intellectual property and other assets used;
- contractual and actually controlled risks;
- market and geographic conditions;
- deliverables and evidence of receipt;
- charging basis, allocation key and payment terms;
- alternatives realistically available to each party.
If conduct differs from the agreement, update the operational model or analyse the actual arrangement. A backdated contract that does not match performance is weak evidence.
Choose the method after the functional analysis
Article 34 lists five recognised methods:
- comparable uncontrolled price;
- resale price;
- cost plus;
- transactional net margin;
- transactional profit split.
Another method may be used where the listed methods cannot reasonably apply and the taxpayer can demonstrate that the alternative meets the arm’s-length condition. Method selection depends on reliable comparables, transaction characteristics, functions, assets, risks and available data—not on which method produces the preferred tax result.
Document the tested party, financial indicator, period, search criteria, adjustments and reason rejected alternatives were less reliable.
Evidence differs by transaction type
| Transaction | Evidence beyond the invoice |
|---|---|
| Management/service fee | Scope, staff time, deliverables, benefit, allocation key and absence of duplication |
| Loan or cash pool | Principal, term, currency, security, credit profile, purpose, interest and repayment evidence |
| IP licence | Ownership/rights, functions developing and exploiting IP, territory, revenue base and comparable licence terms |
| Goods | Product specification, volume, market, freight, warranty, inventory risk and comparable sales |
| Guarantee | Obligation, benefit, borrower credit impact, terms and pricing analysis |
| Owner/director payment | Role, services, approval, market value and separation from dividend or capital return |
| Cost allocation | Cost pool, beneficiaries, allocation key, exclusions and reconciliation to accounts |
Evidence should exist when the transaction occurs. A year-end journal with no underlying service or approval is not repaired by a benchmark alone.
Domestic transactions still need analysis
The rule is not limited to cross-border payments. A transaction between UAE persons can shift income between ordinary-rate, exempt, loss-making, Small Business Relief or Qualifying Free Zone positions. Even where the immediate tax rate appears equal, the statutory relationship and arm’s-length requirements still need to be considered.
Separate the transfer-pricing analysis from withholding tax, VAT, customs, economic substance, accounting and regulatory treatment. They may use the same agreement but apply different legal tests.
Connected Person payments require their own evidence
Payments or benefits to owners, directors, officers and other Connected Persons often combine employment, management, shareholder and financing roles. Identify the legal capacity in which the person acts.
The file should show services actually performed, commercial benefit, authorisation, market-value analysis and accounting/tax classification. A board resolution supports approval but does not by itself prove arm’s-length value or service delivery.
Disclosure and FTA response readiness
Prepare the related-party schedule at transaction level, then reconcile it to the trial balance, financial statements and return. Record counterparty name and status, relationship, transaction category, amount, method and supporting file location.
The FTA Guide says master and local files are maintained contemporaneously and may be requested within 30 days, or a longer period agreed by the FTA. A response process should therefore exist before a request arrives:
- confirm scope and deadline;
- freeze the submitted-period data;
- map each question to an indexed document;
- reconcile translations and currencies;
- obtain authorised review;
- retain submission and acknowledgement.
Do not send inconsistent draft contracts, unsupported spreadsheets or privileged advice without a controlled review.
Year-end control
Before closing the period:
- update relationship and transaction inventories;
- confirm agreements match conduct;
- calculate recurring charges using approved keys;
- test actual results against the selected method;
- identify true-ups and their legal/accounting/VAT treatment;
- complete disclosure and file-threshold calculations;
- document losses, restructurings and one-off transactions;
- set remediation owners and deadlines.
A true-up should not be a unexplained plug to reach a target margin. The contract, calculation, invoice and reason must align.
Governance across legal, finance and operations
Assign a named owner for the related-party register, agreements, pricing calculations and year-end true-ups. Legal should verify the parties and enforceable terms; finance should reconcile the amounts to the ledger and disclosure; operational owners should prove the service, asset, funding or risk actually supplied. A quarterly exception report should flag a new related party, a material change in volume, an undocumented charge, a loss-making arrangement or a method that no longer fits the facts.
This control is useful below the formal master-file and local-file thresholds as well. It preserves the evidence needed to explain the arm’s-length outcome and prevents the annual Corporate Tax return from becoming the first time the business discovers its related-party population.
Transfer pricing cannot be owned by the tax return preparer alone. Legal must keep agreements and authority current; finance must code counterparties and transaction categories consistently; operations must preserve deliverables and time/resource evidence; treasury must implement approved loan and payment terms; the tax owner must reconcile the result and disclosures.
Assign a named owner to every recurring transaction and a reviewer independent from the calculation. New related parties, restructurings, IP transfers, guarantees and material changes to functions or risk should trigger review before the invoice is issued. Maintain a decision log recording the business change, affected agreement, selected method, evidence update and approval.
Where the group uses a global policy, prepare a UAE implementation memo. A global benchmark or agreement may not match the local entity’s actual function, accounts, tax status or available comparables.
For policy design, documentation and filing support, use UAE tax support and tax planning.
Frequently asked questions
Do transfer-pricing rules apply below AED 200 million revenue?
The AED 200 million figure is one condition for formal master/local files. The arm’s-length standard can still apply below it.
Do UAE-to-UAE transactions need transfer-pricing analysis?
Potentially yes. The Corporate Tax rule is not limited to cross-border transactions.
Is a signed intercompany agreement enough?
No. The agreement must match actual conduct, commercial benefit, pricing and supporting evidence.
Which method must every company use?
There is no universal method. Article 34 requires the most reliable method for the transaction and available evidence.
Does Small Business Relief remove the arm’s-length rule?
No. Current FTA guidance says the arm’s-length principle remains even where relief changes formal documentation requirements.
How quickly can the FTA request files?
The FTA Guide says master and local files may be requested within 30 days, unless the FTA agrees a longer period.
Corporate Tax Law, Ministerial Decision No. 97 and FTA guidance checked 21 July 2026. Relationship definitions, disclosures and documentation must be confirmed for the relevant period. General information only.
A complete roadmap for launching and running a business in the UAE — in our guide 'How to Do Business in the UAE?'
In the guide, you will find not only basic information but also expert recommendations based on real cases and deep jurisdictional knowledge:
- How to register a Mainland company
- Types of business licenses in the UAE
- What to do in the UAE after registering your company
- When a bank account in the UAE can be closed
- How to use cryptocurrency in the UAE
- All about UAE corporate tax and IP-Box incentives
Related services
Ready to discuss your project?















